I'm not understanding the 6/150 concept. That seems very favourable to trout, but not to the Angels...
I haven't seen this discussed yet on this thread, but do you people remember that he's entitled to like 600k this season?? The contract then, would essentially be 5/149 for the years 2015-2019. 3 of those years are under arbitration, where he is entitled to 40, 60 and 80% of his worth. A $30 mill aav over a 5 year period, where 3 are arb, seems crazy. I'm not saying he's not worth the money, but low salary in 2014 and arbitration protect the Angels check book to some extent...
If Trout DOESN'T sign an extension, this is how I'd anticipate his next 4 year playing out in Anaheim (conservatively):
2014: $1 million
2015: $13M
2016: $21M
2017: $30M
=$65 million
So you're buying out 2 FA years at $42.5M per. Would the Angels not be better served either seeking a much longer term deal, or just playing out 1 or 2 more season?