Statistics and golf, lol. Kinda pointless, limited value for golf which is 90% mental. Statistics needs repeatability to be of value, and repeatability only exists in a very limited way in golf. Every golfer, including pros, go through unpredictable and massive peaks and valleys. Especially when it comes to putting.
Let's continue this debate at the end of this year after we see how Scheffler does in the other 3 majors.
No Tiger is not a 1 in 100 years athlete. Jack and Tiger careers overlap (Woods turned pro in 1996, and Jack finished 6th at the 1998 Masters). And Jack's career was slightly better.