Jump to content
Jays Centre
  • Create Account

GD

Old-Timey Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    29,344

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Profiles

Toronto Blue Jays Videos

2025 Toronto Blue Jays Top Prospects Ranking

Toronto Blue Jays Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2025 Toronto Blue Jays Draft Pick Tracker

News

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by GD

  1. GD
    PLEASE CHANGE THE THREAD TITLE it keeps giving me a heart attack Maybe put like "Rumor: Jays in the lead for Santana and Jimenez" or something like that
  2. GD
    I don't want either. Garza, Tanaka or nothing.
  3. GD
    Um. Joking, right?
  4. GD
    Mods for the love of god change the thread title I nearly had a heart attack
  5. GD

    NHL Thread

    GD replied to GD's topic in Other Sports

    Ftfy
  6. GD
    Yeah, I know, that's useful for a back of the napkin kind of thing. The wOBA regression was fairly complex for the non-engineers of us, IIRC.
  7. GD
    JFaS regressed him to a .315 BABIP once, and before theblujay freaked the f*** out about not appreciating the game, he found that Colby would've been good for a .340 wOBA or somewhere around that, which is like a 108 wRC+. So not quite as extreme as .240/.315, his power helps.
  8. GD
    Ftr he played in 129 in '11, when he had a pretty bad injury after we acquired him, I think it was his wrist.
  9. GD
    I speculate that this is an awesome post, lol.
  10. GD
    Hudson would have looked very nice in the rotation.
  11. GD
    Had no idea Hentgen's dad was ill, hope he gets better, gonna miss Hentgen being a part of the staff. Anyone heard of Stanley? Name rings a bell but don't know anything off the top of my head.
  12. GD
    Bailey's probably close to league average next year. Ehh. It's not terribly unlikely that Rasmus is better than Bailey and Gose combined next year imo.
  13. GD
    no one likes you ugh Seriously though, I wouldn't mind coming up with more just for shits and giggles proposals. I'm sure KC is pushing a Butler/Rasmus swap, but I'd probably want Ventura back in any Rasmus deal.
  14. GD
    o sheet
  15. GD
    Same could be said for you. You haven't exactly been calm either and it was a very easy to misinterpret post. Thank you.
  16. GD
    Ah, I thought you were just saying that they weren't very strongly correlated period. Yeah, FIP is .452, much closer.
  17. GD
    You said there's probably a correlation (which there is) but that it's probably not significant (which it pretty well is (significant), I would say). Where'd I misunderstand? I don't quite see.
  18. GD
    Yup, I got .224, rounded. Why would you square it as opposed to just the R value?
  19. GD
    It's whatever the hell the =CORREL function gave me in excel, lol. What's the difference? And I compared them because that was what the topic at hand was. I wouldn't have otherwise.
  20. GD
    Apparently it was. You weren't sure of the correlation between the two. And LunchBox said this, which turned out to be fairly incorrect. Their correlation was being questioned, at the very least by LB.
  21. GD
    oMg TrAdEd!
  22. GD
    Um, guys, not that difficult lol. Having a lower walk rate lowers WHIP because you'll have less walks per inning, and it lowers your FIP cause it's a DIPS stat, and a lower FIP results in a higher fWAR, so yeah, WHIP is correlated to fWAR. It has a -.473 or so r^2 (all individual seasons since 1947 min 50 IP). The lower the WHIP, the higher the fWAR, the higher the fWAR, the lower the WHIP. They're correlated.
  23. GD
    Well hey, he's an important member of this board, snuffing all those teenage annoyances out with his valuable spamming of the report feature. I'm sure he's banned many an unsuspecting teenage fool. It fits him.
  24. GD
    99% sure it's him
  25. GD
    I'm really interested in seeing these projections. Namely, because I love the work JFaS has been doing, but some of his projections (Buehrle, Jenkins, Ubaldo) strike me as varying from the conventional wisdom and very believable.
×
×
  • Create New...