Over large enough samples, sure, but JJ, as someone with a .302 BABIP (not too out of the range of normal), isn't exactly someone I'd classify a BABIP beater, especially not based off of an 81.1 IP sample.
Article seems interesting though.
Didn't we get comp for Frasor? Two nothing prospects for comp would've been very good. I didn't really think Jaye would ever turn into something. And isn't Webb getting some notoriety too?
Now you're taking my argument out of proportion. It all comes down to looking at results vs process and in the end, DIPS theory. I don't believe in 80 IP of ERA luck but if you do, that's your prerogative. I have better things to do with my Sunday afternoon than have my argument stretched.
I don't think Lowry's the kind of guy that's go hard in a contract year then float it. Doesn't seem like his character. I'm expecting the offense to regress, but his other qualities make up for it. He really doesn't have too many weaknesses.
You ridiculed his opinion based on making fun of his models. Then you call me a f***ing clown and say I'm insecure lol.
ECJFnevergonnabehappy. Less fighting in this thread, more watching Demar's long twos slay the Hawks.
Dickey is famous for inducing weak contact and Buehrle is Buehrle. You can't compare them to JJ.
Don't want to know.
JJ was playing with an infield of Bonifacio, Izturis, Reyes and EE, and no Lawrie for a while too. That + bad luck, plus pitchers not having a ton of control over balls in play, really don't speak to Johnson's ability, good or bad, very much at all.
What was horrific about JJ aside from his results? Serious question. His results were horrific, obviously. But what was horrific about him? Was he not striking guys out? Was he walking too many guys? What is it, Chappy?