John_Havok Old-Timey Member Posted March 3, 2017 Posted March 3, 2017 so with the last 5 year sample size you chose (to include 2 of his most injured years), he still played on average in 127 games. Including an average of 141 in the last 3 years. Calling 100 games the "recent norm" for him seems a little unjust dont you think? I smell a wager coming on.
SAAviour Verified Member Posted March 3, 2017 Posted March 3, 2017 Remember that old Tellez thread that never ended and at the time many people including myself thought was super annoying, from when he was drafted...props to you lovers who loved from day 1!
Daniel Labude Jays Centre Contributor Posted March 3, 2017 Posted March 3, 2017 so with the last 5 year sample size you chose (to include 2 of his most injured years), he still played on average in 127 games. Including an average of 141 in the last 3 years. Calling 100 games the "recent norm" for him seems a little unjust dont you think? Absolutely lol. Not sure why everyone is hung up on that. I was being relative and said seems like his recent norm lol. The point of the question was to see if Bautista would still be a steal at 100-120 games instead of a full year, which has happened in 3 of the last 5 years. Plus, the older you get the more games tend to be missed for a variety of reasons. Not saying it will happen, but it is possible again To the other part...is it fair to Bautista, probably not but it fit the question...didn't mean for it to mean 100 games is his norm now...just a recent trend around that mark
Candy Maldonado Old-Timey Member Posted March 3, 2017 Posted March 3, 2017 Absolutely lol. Not sure why everyone is hung up on that. I was being relative and said seems like his recent norm lol. The point of the question was to see if Bautista would still be a steal at 100-120 games instead of a full year, which has happened in 3 of the last 5 years. Plus, the older you get the more games tend to be missed for a variety of reasons. Not saying it will happen, but it is possible again To the other part...is it fair to Bautista, probably not but it fit the question...didn't mean for it to mean 100 games is his norm now...just a recent trend around that mark double wut?
Spanky99 Old-Timey Member Posted March 3, 2017 Posted March 3, 2017 Absolutely lol. Not sure why everyone is hung up on that. I was being relative and said seems like his recent norm lol. The point of the question was to see if Bautista would still be a steal at 100-120 games instead of a full year, which has happened in 3 of the last 5 years. Plus, the older you get the more games tend to be missed for a variety of reasons. Not saying it will happen, but it is possible again To the other part...is it fair to Bautista, probably not but it fit the question...didn't mean for it to mean 100 games is his norm now...just a recent trend around that mark There's no f***ing way you were, sober
Arjun Nimmala New Hampshire Fisher Cats - AA SS The Jays have promoted the 20-year-old shortstop to Double-A New Hampshire! He hit .241/.362/.483 (.845) in his 23-game return to Vancouver. Explore Arjun Nimmala News >
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now