Jump to content
Jays Centre
  • Create Account

Recommended Posts

Posted
so with the last 5 year sample size you chose (to include 2 of his most injured years), he still played on average in 127 games. Including an average of 141 in the last 3 years. Calling 100 games the "recent norm" for him seems a little unjust dont you think?

 

I smell a wager coming on.

  • Replies 64
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
Remember that old Tellez thread that never ended and at the time many people including myself thought was super annoying, from when he was drafted...props to you lovers who loved from day 1!
Jays Centre Contributor
Posted
so with the last 5 year sample size you chose (to include 2 of his most injured years), he still played on average in 127 games. Including an average of 141 in the last 3 years. Calling 100 games the "recent norm" for him seems a little unjust dont you think?

Absolutely lol. Not sure why everyone is hung up on that. I was being relative and said seems like his recent norm lol. The point of the question was to see if Bautista would still be a steal at 100-120 games instead of a full year, which has happened in 3 of the last 5 years.

 

Plus, the older you get the more games tend to be missed for a variety of reasons. Not saying it will happen, but it is possible again

 

To the other part...is it fair to Bautista, probably not but it fit the question...didn't mean for it to mean 100 games is his norm now...just a recent trend around that mark

Posted
Absolutely lol. Not sure why everyone is hung up on that. I was being relative and said seems like his recent norm lol. The point of the question was to see if Bautista would still be a steal at 100-120 games instead of a full year, which has happened in 3 of the last 5 years.

 

Plus, the older you get the more games tend to be missed for a variety of reasons. Not saying it will happen, but it is possible again

 

To the other part...is it fair to Bautista, probably not but it fit the question...didn't mean for it to mean 100 games is his norm now...just a recent trend around that mark

 

double wut?

Posted
Absolutely lol. Not sure why everyone is hung up on that. I was being relative and said seems like his recent norm lol. The point of the question was to see if Bautista would still be a steal at 100-120 games instead of a full year, which has happened in 3 of the last 5 years.

 

Plus, the older you get the more games tend to be missed for a variety of reasons. Not saying it will happen, but it is possible again

 

To the other part...is it fair to Bautista, probably not but it fit the question...didn't mean for it to mean 100 games is his norm now...just a recent trend around that mark

 

There's no f***ing way you were, sober

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The Jays Centre Caretaker Fund
The Jays Centre Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Blue Jays community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...