Jump to content
Jays Centre
  • Create Account

Bringer of Rain Elite Dynasty - - bjmbleagues.com


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 28k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • BTS

    4186

  • Spanky99

    3157

  • Dr. Dinger

    2554

  • Boxcar

    1528

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
Chappy, you just really busy or flaking out?? Pretty sure you wouldn't have wanted to sit two starts in this particular situation.
Old-Timey Member
Posted
Chappy, you just really busy or flaking out?? Pretty sure you wouldn't have wanted to sit two starts in this particular situation.

 

Careful...

Old-Timey Member
Posted
How are teams at or below .500 "good"?

 

Because so much of the league is bad I guess lol. .476 w% is still good for #10 in the league which you'd say is a reasonably good team. I dunno.

Posted
Shelby Miller has pretty much single-handedly s***-tanked my pitching ratios. Just unfathomably bad. Actually, I wouldn't be surprised to find out he has a season-ending injury that he's been hiding. His peripherals reek of a shoulder problem.
Posted

Power rankings aren't based on wins - they're based on the individual team performance. So, if your team goes .330/.425/.560, with 2.08 ERA, 5.2 K/BB and 1.29 WHIP with awesome counting stats, it's going to give you a big boost in the power rankings, even if your team went 0-14 that week. It's meant to have predictive capabilities.

 

It works the other way too, I'm 3rd last in the power rankings but over .500

Posted
Power rankings aren't based on wins - they're based on the individual team performance. So, if your team goes .330/.425/.560, with 2.08 ERA, 5.2 K/BB and 1.29 WHIP with awesome counting stats, it's going to give you a big boost in the power rankings, even if your team went 0-14 that week. It's meant to have predictive capabilities.

 

Yeah, everyone knows that... it was in Amadeus.

Posted

Should have just stuck with the original tiers:

 

.600+ = elite

.550 - .599 = great

.500 - .549 = good

.450 - .499 = average/mediocre

.400 - .449 = poor

sub-.400 = dogshit

 

You really don't need an equal number of teams per tier or whatever dumbass suggestion that was from boxy.

Old-Timey Member
Posted
Should have just stuck with the original tiers:

 

.600+ = elite

.550 - .599 = great

.500 - .549 = good

.450 - .499 = average/mediocre

.400 - .449 = poor

sub-.400 = dogshit

 

You really don't need an equal number of teams per tier or whatever dumbass suggestion that was from boxy.

 

I never suggested that dickcheese.

Old-Timey Member
Posted
Oh maybe jfart then.

 

I actually do my index thingers the same way you do. It's common sense that a team below .500 isn't "good"

Posted
I actually do my index thingers the same way you do. It's common sense that a team below .500 isn't "good"

 

Yeah, nor should we change our definition of what "good" is on a weekly bell curve.

Community Moderator
Posted
If anyone wants in on some V-Mart let me know.

 

wRC+ of 202. He looks like 2014 V-Mart. You should get an excellent return from somebody.

Posted
If anyone wants in on some V-Mart let me know.

 

Well s***, he has 1B eligibility right? I should probably get myself a first baseman.

Posted
Mike Trout has been a better hitter than Bryce Harper this season.

 

Not by wOBA. You don't get bonus points for park factors in fantasy, bro.

Community Moderator
Posted
Not by wOBA. You don't get bonus points for park factors in fantasy, bro.

 

Situations can change. This is a dynasty league. Just pointing out that Trout has been the better hitter than harper, because you'd never know it reading Boxy's dumn posts in the first two weeks of the season.

Posted
Situations can change. This is a dynasty league. Just pointing out that Trout has been the better hitter than harper, because you'd never know it reading Boxy's dumn posts in the first two weeks of the season.

 

Harper has been in a brutal slump the last week, that's regression for ya. He's still beating Trout by wOBA and Yahoo rank tho, so maybe give it a few more days before you put on the full court press.

Community Moderator
Posted
Harper has been in a brutal slump the last week, that's regression for ya. He's still beating Trout by wOBA and Yahoo rank tho, so maybe give it a few more days before you put on the full court press.

 

I wouldn't be surprised if he does finish as the more valuable player than Trout in 2016. But it won't be by a lot, and things like future CF eligibility and injury history factored into the decision too.

Verified Member
Posted
God damn it really pisses me off that I was so close to getting Arenado and had to settle for Sano. FML.

 

I'm rather happy that he was on the board at 15.

Old-Timey Member
Posted
Mike Trout has been a better hitter than Bryce Harper this season.

 

Slumps happen brotato. Also keep in mind that Harper will steal more bases than Trout, probably hit more homers than Trout, hit more RBIs than Trout and might score more runs than Trout.

Posted
Slumps happen brotato. Also keep in mind that Harper will steal more bases than Trout, probably hit more homers than Trout, hit more RBIs than Trout and might score more runs than Trout.

 

Just an FYI, Trout said he was going to run again this year. Whatever that means by seasons end, who knows.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The Jays Centre Caretaker Fund
The Jays Centre Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Blue Jays community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...