Jump to content
Jays Centre
  • Create Account

Recommended Posts

Community Moderator
Posted
Wow so this is the reason I had no Gallardo offers...

 

That and the fact that there were better starters available in the waiver draft.

Community Moderator
Posted
Disagree.

 

I'm expecting him to implode. He has some of the worst stuff in the majors, and has been getting by because of Lucroy and Maldonado. I move do Texas without those two will be ugly I think. I'd prefer Buehrle and 1-2 other guys.

Posted
I'm expecting him to implode. He has some of the worst stuff in the majors, and has been getting by because of Lucroy and Maldonado. I move do Texas without those two will be ugly I think. I'd prefer Buehrle and 1-2 other guys.

 

Buckles will probably have a sub-2 ERA and 23 wins this year. f*** that guy.

Community Moderator
Posted
I'm expecting him to implode. He has some of the worst stuff in the majors, and has been getting by because of Lucroy and Maldonado. I move do Texas without those two will be ugly I think. I'd prefer Buehrle and 1-2 other guys.

 

Last year he tried to switch to a predominantly 2-seamer throwing groundball pitcher. A 91mph sinker seems like a slightly better weapon than a 91mph straight ball.

 

The positive way forward for Gallardo has that transition working out, and him maintaining most of his overall skill while turning into a guy with more grounders and less K's.

 

Projections don't particularly like him (especially Steamer - 4.61 ERA in Arlington), but they might not really "see" the transition he made last year.

 

As a locked in SP with some track record though, he's still probably better than replacement level. Many worse players were kept!

Community Moderator
Posted

56 SVG - Tommy Hunter

57 TF - Tanner Scheppers

58 TRM - Rajai Davis

59 FTD - Casey Fien

60 N49 - Allen Webster

61 GP - 6:33pm

62 JF

63 BOX

64 HVK

65 KK

66 SVG

67 SAM

68 SVG

69 SPG

70 BTS

71 ZRO

72 TCA

73 NJH

Community Moderator
Posted

The waiver draft looks just as flat this year as it turned out to be last year.

 

No notable separation in my mind between guys like Fien and Hunter, and first round guys like Shaw, Soriano, and Broxton.

 

Rajai Davis could also very easily outperform Danny Santana or Scott Van Slyke (and also Kang or Montero, sadly).

Posted
The waiver draft looks just as flat this year as it turned out to be last year.

 

No notable separation in my mind between guys like Fien and Hunter, and first round guys like Shaw, Soriano, and Broxton.

 

Rajai Davis could also very easily outperform Danny Santana or Scott Van Slyke (and also Kang or Montero, sadly).

 

Rajai Davis was the pick of the draft.

Community Moderator
Posted
Rajai Davis is a poor man's Ben Revere.

 

Poor man's?

Steamer600 (HR/SB/RBI/R):

 

Rajai --> 9/43/70/56; .266/.310/.377

Revere --> 3/35/59/40; .283/.315/.346

 

Of course, Revere probably plays every day.

 

But a fantasy owner in this league wouldn't be playing Revere every day...

Posted
I was actually going to take Rajai if Revere was gone. As I mentioned previously, Rajai is Top 5 in HR+SB over the last 3 years. Pretty impressive considering he doesn't hit many HR and never has a locked down starting job. SB are indeed rare these days.
Community Moderator
Posted
If Billy Hamilton posts the same stat line as last year, who, hypothetically, would cut him before 2016? (assume you can't find a trade partner)
Posted
If Billy Hamilton posts the same stat line as last year, who, hypothetically, would cut him before 2016? (assume you can't find a trade partner)

 

Assuming I can't get anything for him, I personally would cut him. It depends on how crowded your keepers list is though. The elite SB are great but he kills you in three categories, contibutes next to nothing in two, and is okay in one.

 

Now he'll go on to post a .310/.345/.430 line in 2015, and my above comments will land in someone's sig.

Posted
Rajai Davis could also very easily outperform Danny Santana or Scott Van Slyke (and also Kang or Montero, sadly).

 

I took Santana before I traded for Kang so the CF/SS eligibility was a selling feature for me.

I wouldn't be surprised if Rajai outperformed him, but at least he's got some upside

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The Jays Centre Caretaker Fund
The Jays Centre Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Blue Jays community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...