Jump to content
The Cardinals are in town, join our game thread! ×
Jays Centre
  • Create Account

jmomcc

Verified Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    1,259

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

 Content Type 

Profiles

Toronto Blue Jays Videos

2026 Toronto Blue Jays Top Prospects Ranking

Toronto Blue Jays Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2025 Toronto Blue Jays Draft Pick Tracker

News

2026 Toronto Blue Jays Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by jmomcc

  1. jmomcc
    Alford is perplexing. I remember him being good at double a pre his first call up and the hamate injury.
  2. jmomcc
    I might be about to say something dumb but is it a big deal that a catcher is fat? They don’t really play every day any more and you don’t have to run much.
  3. jmomcc
    Don’t quote me on this but I read somewhere that Keuchel would cost a 2020 pick if signed after the draft.
  4. jmomcc
    I don’t like that piece because it is vague as f***. However, I’ve never seen any evidence that bullying makes baseball teams better. I mean it sounds very rah rah and whatever.. but I doubt it makes much difference. Unless, the reason we fell off because we weren’t bullying enough. Didn’t no one think to bully Bautista when he stopped hitting? Also, for the love of god, someone should have bullied tulo into not being hurt all the time.
  5. jmomcc
    I was just working under the scenario we were talking about tbh. I don’t have a ton of confidence that he would ever replicate that season.
  6. jmomcc
    Ok, so looking closer at Eovaldi and Sanchez. Assuming Sanchez replicates his 2016 season, wouldn’t that make him more attractive? He would have one bad year and one good year. Eovaldi had one lost year and one good year. They would be around the same age at signing. I’ll be honest though, I don’t know much about the nitty gritty of underlying pitcher stats. It’s possible that Eovaldi is more attractive but to me Sanchez’s 2016 seems quite a bit better than Eovaldi’s 2018. What am I missing here?
  7. jmomcc
    Oh, I assumed his projections were average at very worst. My bad.
  8. jmomcc
    I kind of think this is light. Sanchez would have strung two good years together right before the contract in this scenario. I donÂ’t think Eovaldi at least had. IÂ’d guess maybe, 4/75 - 85 in that ballpark. The one advantage of doing 5/60 right now, is that you could frontload some of that unto this year and next year. 2019 - 15 2020 - 15 2021- 23 -10 IÂ’m not sure if I would do it but I see the attraction. Making the last year an option would make it more palatable.
  9. jmomcc
    I think you just try to trade smoak.
  10. jmomcc
    If Sanchez has a good season where he shows himself to be healthy and at like 90% of his best year, then you aren’t getting him for 5/60. This is the kind of deal he might sign right now but not after a successful year imo.
  11. jmomcc
    Kirk walked three times to get to .436 on base and Lopez had two more hits. What level can we start getting really excited about these guys, high A? Is Kirk considered a real catching prospect?
  12. jmomcc
    So, I know we have 1.5m extra to spend this year. Any news yet on who they might be spending it on? Or will it just be a bunch of small signings?
×
×
  • Create New...