I like how he talks about lack of track record for guys like Matz and Aaron Nola, but says that he definitely would have included Joe Ross had he not gotten injured, except that Ross is not as good as the other two starters and actually projects worse. I guess he argued that since Matz is two years older then Ross is more valuable, which, um, okay I guess, but then what is the reasoning for Nola, a higher ERA?
And then there's the fact that he included two pitching prospects in his top 50, and one of them wasn't Julio Urias (meaning he will have a better ranking, but this I could understand).