Well, yes. Not in all cases but I think the “everyone gets a trophy” philosophy comes from a certain side. So naturally they’d be a little less cutthroat and mean on results. Just don’t send the wrong Tweet
However, it’s understood that not everyone fits in a box. There’s nothing wrong with generalizing if you know it’s not iron clad
If one were the only see the Bluejay content of Bloody Chins posts, I think they would guess wrong on his political affiliation. He seems very angry for a Bud Light supporter. That rage is normally only directed at political foes, not likeminded individuals with regards to rainbows and trees. A bit of an anomaly if you ask me
After that we have the park adjustment, which we arrive at using the additive method. Here we are essentially calculating how many runs per plate appearance we should add or subtract from a player’s total based on their home environment. To do so, we take MLB average R/PA and subtract out the MLB average R/PA times the park factor. To properly use the park factor, you should take the number listed on our park factor page and divide it by 100. So a 98 park factor should be used as 0.98 in this equation.
Bro, it used to be like that. You adjust for the league etc and just the park factor of where they play their home games. They didn’t consider what the actual splits were
I’m not reading. I added the disclaimer it could’ve changed. Everything I know is 5 years ago. I have very little new knowledge. That covers life in general. How many sexual orientations are there?
It’s, or was, pretty basic logic. You got a .900 OPS guy, his home field is Coors, you would adjust down his numbers as not being a true talent .900 OPS bat. But if he hit .750 at Coors and 1.000 on the road, why would you assume that?
Well it used to be just taking players X numbers and then using the park factor of their home park to determine to scale it up or down.
So if RC was a hitters park, you would grade Vlads numbers down
That’s the flaw in wRC+. Not sure if it’s ever been fixed. Like if a player hits better away from Coors than he does at home, why would you adjust his numbers down, if anything they’d go up, or something idk?
You jelly. They have a bunch of potential impact bats knocking on the door. Toronto is limping along with a complete empty chamber for a farm. They have one of their best SP coming back from injury and Grayson is a long ways from being a bust.
It doesn’t appear they need to make any big FA splashes. Maybe hit on some contributors