Is this a new thing? Also idk how you can count this as enough evidence to overturn the call, the ball disappears in the frame, I thought the ball had to touch the back of the glove in order to be a catch? When the ball disappears from the frame I guess his foot wasn't really all the way down on the base, but literally a few milliseconds late his foot came down... probably the same time it took the ball to be caught. We've had clearer reviews that have been called inconclusive, I'm struggling to see how this is conclusive enough to overturn a call