Jump to content
Jays Centre
  • Create Account

G-Snarls

Community Moderator
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    41,163

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    15

 Content Type 

Profiles

Toronto Blue Jays Videos

2026 Toronto Blue Jays Top Prospects Ranking

Toronto Blue Jays Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2025 Toronto Blue Jays Draft Pick Tracker

News

2026 Toronto Blue Jays Draft Pick Tracker

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by G-Snarls

  1. G-Snarls
    Would anyone do 5 years 150M if it was restructured to include the 2016 season that's about to start? Would Bautista do that? He gets an increase for 2016 but we avoid paying him at age 41.
  2. G-Snarls
    Change your numbers to 4 years 100M (4 x 25) vs 5 years 110M (5 x 22) or something similar and your point will be better made (I understand the point you're TRYING to make - that shorter terms at higher annual average value can make sense. But no one would ever pay more TOTAL money for fewer years. Which is what your numbers show. That's why people are harassing you)
  3. G-Snarls
  4. G-Snarls
    Yes. That's what he was always bitter about. http://www.boston.com/sports/baseball/redsox/extras/extra_bases/2014/01/ortiz_rumbling_about_contract_status.html
  5. G-Snarls
    Yes. Bitching to the Boston media about his contract anyway. Complaining about the front office.
  6. G-Snarls
    Ortiz pulls this kind of s*** every single year in spring training
  7. G-Snarls
  8. G-Snarls
    Keep the 10M available for the trade deadline when we know what we actually need
  9. G-Snarls
    Exactly He was.probably ashamed of his offensive performance and is motivated to improve again. Simple as that. The funny thing is all the casuals who think he can't hit. Like they'd never heard of him before we got him or something.
  10. G-Snarls
    Agree 100% Plus extra intangible stuff makes him the more likely choice
  11. G-Snarls
    2014 he was one of the absolute best hitters in the game. Wish he'd just do whatever that required again. LOL 170 wRC+ FTW
  12. G-Snarls
    No, you're right: http://www.rockieszingers.com/2014/05/14/troy-tulowitzki-changed-something/ http://espn.go.com/blog/sweetspot/post/_/id/48936/troy-tulowitzki-best-hitter-in-the-game http://hittingperformancelab.com/troy-tulowitzki/
  13. G-Snarls
    So Gibby will bat him 5th instead of 1st
  14. G-Snarls
    Especially against the Yankees
  15. G-Snarls
    Gibby has always been high on Sanchez
  16. G-Snarls
    So I take from this zero chance Osuna gets a shot at the rotation?!?!
  17. G-Snarls
    I missed this tidbit from the same interview: In Marcus Stroman, R.A. Dickey, Marco Estrada and J.A. Happ, the Blue Jays have four of the members of 2016′s starting rotation set. Who will man that final spot remains cloudy, but Gibbons did shed some light on the situation Monday. “We’re going to stretch (Aaron Sanchez) out and see how that all plays out in the spring; decide whether we’re better as a team with him in the rotation or in the bullpen,” the Blue Jays skipper said. “And then of course you have (Drew Hutchison) and you have Jesse Chavez. So there’ll be some good competition.”
  18. G-Snarls
    The 31-year-old also has a career on-base percentage of .369. Gibbons says Tulowitzki would likely be open to stepping back into the role in 2016, but feels the veteran might be more comfortable elsewhere. “Tulo had always told me — and I believe him and I still think he feels this way — he’ll hit wherever we want him to,” he said. “I think he likes it a little bit further down to be honest with you, so we’ll see. But it really is a hole right now.”
  19. G-Snarls
    Gibbons interview on the topic: http://www.sportsnet.ca/baseball/mlb/gibbons-leadoff-spot-a-hole-in-blue-jays-lineup/
  20. G-Snarls
    All he has said is that it's a hole, they have options and that he and/or Tulo prefer him further down in the lineup.
  21. G-Snarls
    There was a round table on MLB Network yesterday about the top 5 catchers in baseball. Everyone had Posey #1 of course. Everyone also had Martin in their top 5, one as high as #2.
  22. G-Snarls
    Honestly though, if I'm Gibbons, I have to say something to Pillar about lobbying for the leadoff spot on Twitter and at charity dinners.
  23. G-Snarls
    Yeah. This has been discussed on here several times. Before they got Henderson the lineup probably should have been. Alomar Molitor Olerud Carter With White 9th Once they got Henderson, you move that top 4 back one spot But oh well. Back to back WS.
  24. G-Snarls
    Cito would have loved Anthony Gose and Billy Hamilton. Black, nice low OBP, crazy fast.
  25. G-Snarls
    True Only fast looking black guys can hit leadoff as far as Cito was concerned
×
×
  • Create New...