GD

Score more runs than the other team

Why wouldn't we just trade for Oswaldo Arcia or someone instead

Ok tips

The Spurs' bench would be, like, the 3rd seed in the East

NHL teams value depth guys really weirdly

Josh Johnson was a chubster.

Wow, look at Tony Blengino getting over his percentile addiction. Glad his treatment went well.

No. Glad we had this talk

Hmm. I wonder who his most frequent teammates are. He also comes off the bench which weakens his competition.

Biyombo is infuriating on the offensive end but eh, he's a nice cheap bench piece. Patterson has looked a lot better since the start of the year. His mobility and the fact that he's actually going for boards this year (dunno how often he's actually getting them but he's more aggressive in the process) are useful. Hopefully he finds his stroke again f*** Luis Scola

Patrick Patterson is still salvageable imo

lol, transparent

What's the pen looking like? Storen Osuna Cecil Loup Floyd Biagini Rowen?? Aardsma?? Venditte?? not bad not bad

IL me f***ing pusso

This isn't even the 32nd weirdest thing that yahoo does imho

Lol f*** me for posting about advanced stats at 5 AM. Concede the Drtg point. I still don't buy Pau being better though. Then again I'm still with you on Demar not being a max player.

Hi, five years.

I recall Spittin messaging me saying I was the only one who hadn't accepted the invite

They fully even out on defense. Derozan's DRtg is much better, Pau's RPM is much better, and their WS are about equal.

This seems lacking in correctness Pau has lower efficiency stats on a lower usage rate. Demar assists on a higher percentage of teammate baskets, while Pau rebounds more, which are both expected considering their respective positions. Demar does these things without playing in an actual, you know, offensive system. I'm pretty sure you've just taken too deep a stance on a particular player and legit refuse to think otherwise.

Don't worry I'm Jewish I'll find a better deal

seems legit

Took Tommy Hunter. Can someone pm next?

I remember reading that actually. This would apply to more than Safeco too I would think. Probably mostly just in extreme situations, but Coors, Arizona, AT/T, etc I assume would all have players mis-evaluated by wRC+ depending on their batted ball profile.

@Dinger and Cyborg Dinger, Cyborg is saying that the altitude or whatever s*** it is at Safeco is suppressing Seager's fly balls from leaving the yard. This is not accounted for by park factors in the same way that a fly ball hitter at Coors benefits more than the average hitter from Coors. They're being compared to the same run scoring environment (if I understand park factors correctly), but one player has a leg up (or down in Seager's case) on the other just due to the park factors being more of a proxy than anything. However, Cyborg, I think it would be interesting to look into if it would actually be that big a boost. I don't think 130 wRC+ guy is accurate. Theoretically, if fly balls are suppressed in Safeco, then pitchers would induce more fly balls on Seattle hitters. So in a neutral park, Seager would have more fly balls leave the yard, but fewer fly balls in total. however, if pitchers don't actually behave in the expected manner, then you would have something exploitable in a variety of ways. I don't know if my interpretation of park factors is right. I'm assuming it's just a player's runs compared to (above) what you would expect in the run scoring environment. Overall, not broken down into parts.