Thanks, All! This is a great discussion. I'm definitely in favor of making the game more accurate/fair, and robo-calls of balls and strikes would definitely do that. Although, I still maintain that having an ump back there ringing the batter up, for example, is important to maintaining the entertainment factor for fans. I like z3r0s suggestion of keeping the ump behind the plate and giving him an earpiece. The union would definitely fight that, and they would argue that it essentially turns umpires into mimics. I know a lot of people on here will say, "who cares? Screw 'em!"; however, if that is the attitude taken by the league, then we won't have any umpires at all and we'll potentially be left with the anticlimactic problem I originally brought up. Or, I suppose the league could replace the umpires with actors. Although, that has the potential to devolve into something pretty cheesy rather quickly.
With all of that said, I am wondering how far some people are willing to go with robo-umps. Who is in favor of automating the entire game? For example, having sensors in the bases and the balls in order to determine whether the batter/runner touched the base first or the ball touched the first baseman's glove first. Or, whether the runner tagging from third left the base before the outfielder caught the fly ball or not. Or, whether the ball in the infielders glove touched the runner before the runner touched the base. What do people think of that sort of thing?