I understand what the predictive stats say, I get it. It's not difficult to grasp.
My view is that until things start going backwards, I'm going to roll with the guy who is OPS'ing .890, or whatever it is.
Others obviously place more emphasis on what they think should have happened, not what actually did happen. I don't think that's fair to Cola though, nor do I think that's the way playing time should be decided. It's not exactly a small sample size anymore.
We can go back and forth on this all day, I quote his OPS, you quote his BABIP or lack of a proven track record and ultimately it's all just words on a message board.
I just hope he keeps raking.