Keith Law
The Blue Jays won the offseason two years ago with their huge deals with the Marlins and the Mets; those were mostly aimed at remaking their rotation. This winter, their moves so far have focused on overhauling the lineup, and while wins in November don't always mean wins the next October, a deal that nets them Josh Donaldson for Brett Lawrie and a trio of prospects is a damn good start for Toronto general manager Alex Anthopoulos. He's added one of the best players in baseball for a package of prospects that doesn't quite add up.
Donaldson turns 29 next month and is just entering his first year of arbitration, and he'll have four such seasons because he's a super-two player this winter. He's second among position players in WAR over the last two seasons, a contributor with his bat, his eye, his power, his glove, and his arm. My No. 76-ranked prospect heading into the 2008 season, Donaldson was drafted by the Cubs out of Auburn where he caught and played the infield corners, coming to Oakland as a "sleeper" in the Rich Harden trade. The A's kept trying to make him a catcher (understandably) until 2012, but soon after they settled him at third base, that compact swing and lower-body power came back.
Over the last two seasons, his only two full years in the majors, Donaldson ranks sixth in the majors in unintentional walks drawn and 18th in homers, the latter particularly impressive since he played half his games in a home-run graveyard. He's been the second-best third baseman in baseball over that span, behind only Adrian Beltre, and even a 5-WAR season from him -- worse than the Steamer projections for him for 2013 -- would be a 3-4 win upgrade for Toronto. I'd rather give up what Toronto gave up and pay Donaldson his arbitration salaries for four years than sign Pablo Sandoval for nine figures over five.
What I don't quite get is the A's portion of this, even if you take fairly optimistic views of all four players they acquired. Is this really enough for four years of control of one of the best players in baseball? Brett Lawrie is still only 24 years old, and has energy and athleticism to spare, but he gets hurt way too often and has become a severe groundball hitter thanks to a swing that has his hands moving down at the ball from his load. He's an above-average defender at third; he might make you think he's elite because of his highlight-reel plays, but scouts and advanced metrics (UZR/dRS) agree that he's not. What he does do well, however, is put the ball in play, a skill that GMs seem to be telling us this winter that they're valuing more highly than ever (tip your cap in the direction of Kansas City as you read that). There's power in the body if the A's can overhaul his swing, but that's a significant undertaking with any player -- and Lawrie will have to be healthy to make it matter. I still think his upside is a 4-5 win player, but I believe the probability of him getting there is half of what it used to be.
Franklin Barreto is a little fella, 5-foot-8 and 170 pounds or so, with a good feel to hit and plus speed but lacking strength to have even average power. He's a shortstop now, erratic but agile enough to become average to slightly above given time and a lot of patience, but with even odds or so that he ends up at second base because he can't develop the consistency he'll need to make 700 plays a year at short. I believe the bat will play somewhere, as his swing is very short and direct and he's shown excellent ability to barrel up the ball so far. He'll play all of 2015 at age 19 and should be able to go to the full-season Midwest League.
Sean Nolin and Kendall Graveman are both back-end starter types, working with fringy stuff and no real out pitch but above-average command and control. Graveman sits at or just under average velocity as a starter, but was 90-94 in relief at the end of the year for the Jays, getting on top of the ball well to generate downhill plane. Nolin, a left-hander, sits mostly 90-92 with a decent changeup, working by changing speeds and throwing strikes, but is a below-average athlete with a stiff delivery. Graveman has a little more upside with better velocity and a new cutter, while Nolin has size and the left-handedness. The big reveal here is that Oakland loves this type of player, having had success with guys like this in the past -- Tom Milone standing out as the best example, pitching well at home for the A's but much worse away from their pitcher-friendly park, taking advantage of their strong defense everywhere they played. Graveman and Nolin may have more value to Oakland than to most other suitors, but that doesn't alter the absolute balance of the deal.
I can understand what the Jays are doing -- they traded three prospects who are either far away or low upside, plus the one major-leaguer they'll directly replace in the deal, to acquire one of the best players in baseball, on top of signing one of the best catchers in baseball as a free agent. They still need to add a starting pitcher, but they have several young arms whom they can mix and match in the last two spots in the rotation. I can't quite fathom what the A's are doing, at least not yet; they signed Billy Butler, which seemed more like a win-now move, but dealing Donaldson makes the team worse in 2015 and doesn't save them that much money in the short term because he's only first-time eligible (for arbitration). They don't have a viable shortstop for this year, and could use an upgrade at second, which would imply they're thinking 2016 and beyond -- but in that case, why sign Butler for three years?
If Beane isn't playing for this year, he might have to look at trading Jeff Samardzija and/or Scott Kazmir now, as both players are free agents after 2015. I don't doubt their ability to get more out of the out-of-favor players they acquire, but it'll be hard for the return on Donaldson here to match all the value they gave up.