What's irksome is you continually bringing this up again, but eh. He was using the samples he chose arbitrarily to say that the players mentioned have sucked this season. I said that you can't choose a 2 week sample to evaluate an entire season on. He then said he wasn't saying that the players sucked, only that the two week stretch sucked. I can't argue that any further, because if that's what he truly meant, great, but there isn't really a way of verifying exactly what he thought. Then, you said that you can't evaluate guys on two week stretches, but that doesn't mean that they didn't suck. I agree with that. So basically, the root of the problem is Convo either backtracked, or the rest of the board wasn't clear on what he was saying. Now, you're bringing this up once again, because of course. Whereas I think the rest of the board is done with this, as they minus 49, TL, etc, were as soon as it started, so we could probably get away with maybe ending this now without beating a dead horse any further.