Jump to content
Jays Centre
  • Create Account

Omar

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    17,278
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    92

 Content Type 

Profiles

Toronto Blue Jays Videos

2026 Toronto Blue Jays Top Prospects Ranking

Toronto Blue Jays Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2025 Toronto Blue Jays Draft Pick Tracker

News

2026 Toronto Blue Jays Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by Omar

  1. TheHurl moves to 5-0 on GDT started............wish he started all the gdt in April:(
  2. This team.......so forgettable.
  3. Osuna Matata!!!
  4. Tuned in to see KP hit one out.....lets win some games and get the hell out of St. Pete!
  5. We're still in the basement...........but we're not alone.
  6. Prince Fielder...though dad was a doughboy as well.
  7. Not sure how many home runs he hit that were 400-440ft. If they all went 10% further then they would be warning track shots. Interesting exercise....a lot of variables. And sometimes we just get this ( the universe unfolds as it should).....
  8. Perhaps somewhere in between? Perhaps the ball was juiced in the 90's.
  9. I recall that they calculated 10% more distance from 3% increase in bat speed. Sounds high but because the batter has faster reaction time, gets better wood on the ball etc. the effects are huge.
  10. Well bat speed shouldnt increase the further a player gets out of his prime years (see Barry Bonds). We have pitch velocity and homerun distance plus factor in bat weight and factor in some coefficients.....some tall foreheads can give you batspeed.
  11. For further reading check out The Physics of Baseball by Prof Robert Adair (chapter 6 is about bat weight, bat speed and presents in precis form the where the up to 5% number comes from. https://www.amazon.ca/Physics-Baseball-Revised-Updated-Expanded/dp/0060084367 ....only if you like math, science and unsupported theories.
  12. It was also published in the Baseball Research Journal a year later in 2009.
  13. The article was published in the American journal of Physics in 2008....a peer reviewed publication. I have the copy in my basement somewhere and you're tempting me to go on a scavenger hunt. Where do you get the it is not supported by actual data? just math?
×
×
  • Create New...